Dustin's P.O.V. (point of view)

This was a great selection to read just before writing our own argument papers. It definitely pointed out a few things to keep in mind that will be helpful in sustaining good focus. Without it your readers will either get bored with your piece or realize that it is written close mindedly and lacks real knowledge of your topic. The difference between argument and inquiry is quite substantial when choosing an angle to take in our writing, it can have huge influence on your audiences perception. Argument is a closed process (Ballenger 203). Inquiry on the other hand is open to many possibilities, you may even find yourself debating over your initial stance on an issue. When we question things and use the method of trial and error eventually we come up with better conclusions or solutions to our problems.
It was interesting to see how Ballenger compared Eastern and Western cultures showing the differences in how we argue and conduct ourselves in heated or tense situations. There are quite noticebly, even within the cultures themselves, different levels and types of people who enjoy conflict. Let's face it, who doesn't like to play devil's advocate every once in a while? I don't mind partaking in a casual public debate in the classroom or at work, but I undoubtedly hate friction when it comes to intimate relationships. Sometimes it is necessary though to get to the root of a problem, the only place a problem can really be dealt with!
If the argument is public and especially if it's personal, make sure that you have enough evidence and ammunition to back yo a$$ up. There is nothing more convincing than: stats, polls, studies, surveys, majorities, expert opinions, and best of all stories from the horse's mouth! Good avid research and sound facts are what will help us all to find a solid stance for the foundation of our paper. Each side of a coin is still worth the same amount, with enough conviction your side of the story may gain an escalated value.